Xeon Platinum 8352M vs Platinum 8163
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Platinum 8352M outperforms Xeon Platinum 8163 by a whopping 2753% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Platinum 8163 and Xeon Platinum 8352M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2484 | 168 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | Intel Xeon Platinum | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 14.30 |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| Release date | no data | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Platinum 8163 and Xeon Platinum 8352M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Multiplier | 25 | no data |
| L1 cache | 1.5 MB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 24 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 33 MB | 48 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 81 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Platinum 8163 and Xeon Platinum 8352M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 8 (Multiprocessor) | 2 |
| Socket | Socket P | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 185 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8163 and Xeon Platinum 8352M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | + | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Platinum 8163 and Xeon Platinum 8352M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8163 and Xeon Platinum 8352M are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8163 and Xeon Platinum 8352M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 768 GB | 6 TB |
| Max memory channels | 6 | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 128.001 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8163 and Xeon Platinum 8352M.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | 64 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.98 | 27.96 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 32 |
| Threads | 48 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Xeon Platinum 8352M has a 2753.1% higher aggregate performance score, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
The Xeon Platinum 8352M is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8163 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8163 and Xeon Platinum 8352M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
