EPYC 7352 vs Xeon Phi 7295
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC 7352 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 194 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 10.95 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Series | Intel Xeon Phi | AMD EPYC |
Power efficiency | no data | 15.41 |
Architecture codename | Knights Mill (2017) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
Release date | 18 December 2017 (6 years ago) | 7 August 2019 (5 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,350 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC 7352 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 72 (Doheptaconta-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
Threads | 288 | 48 |
Base clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Multiplier | 15 | 23 |
L1 cache | 4.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
L2 cache | 36 MB | 12 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB (shared) | 128 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
Die size | no data | 192 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 77 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 8,000 million | 4,800 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
VID voltage range | 0.550-1.2V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC 7352 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
Socket | SVLCLGA3647 | TR4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 320 Watt | 155 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC 7352. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC 7352 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
SGX | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC 7352 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC 7352. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR4 Eight-channel |
Maximum memory size | 384 GB | 4 TiB |
Max memory channels | 6 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 115.212 GB/s | 204.763 GB/s |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Max video memory | 1 GB | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 0 MHz | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC 7352.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 36 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 18 December 2017 | 7 August 2019 |
Physical cores | 72 | 24 |
Threads | 288 | 48 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 320 Watt | 155 Watt |
Xeon Phi 7295 has 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.
EPYC 7352, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 106.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC 7352. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC 7352, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.