7 160UL vs Xeon Phi 7120D
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Phi 7120D and Core 7 160UL processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Knights Corner (2012−2014) | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) |
| Release date | 1 March 2014 (10 years ago) | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Phi 7120D and Core 7 160UL basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 61 (Henihexaconta-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 244 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 1.24 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 32 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 350 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 5,000 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Phi 7120D and Core 7 160UL compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SFF 230-pin | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 270 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 7120D and Core 7 160UL. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Phi 7120D and Core 7 160UL technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 7120D and Core 7 160UL are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 7120D and Core 7 160UL. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Phi 7120D and Core 7 160UL.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 March 2014 | 8 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 61 | 10 |
| Threads | 244 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 270 Watt | 15 Watt |
Xeon Phi 7120D has 510% more physical cores and 1933.3% more threads.
7 160UL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 1700% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Phi 7120D and Core 7 160UL. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon Phi 7120D is a server/workstation processor while Core 7 160UL is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Phi 7120D and Core 7 160UL, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
