Xeon Phi 7120D vs Opteron 240
Primary details
Comparing Opteron 240 and Xeon Phi 7120D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Architecture codename | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) | Knights Corner (2012−2014) |
Release date | April 2003 (21 year ago) | 1 March 2014 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Opteron 240 and Xeon Phi 7120D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 61 (Henihexaconta-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 244 |
Base clock speed | no data | 1.24 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 32 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 130 nm | 22 nm |
Die size | 193 mm2 | 350 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 106 million | 5,000 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 240 and Xeon Phi 7120D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | 940 | SFF 230-pin |
Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 270 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 240 and Xeon Phi 7120D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Opteron 240 and Xeon Phi 7120D technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 240 and Xeon Phi 7120D are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 240 and Xeon Phi 7120D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR3, DDR4 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 1 | 61 |
Threads | 1 | 244 |
Chip lithography | 130 nm | 22 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 270 Watt |
Opteron 240 has 217.6% lower power consumption.
Xeon Phi 7120D, on the other hand, has 6000% more physical cores and 24300% more threads, and a 490.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Opteron 240 and Xeon Phi 7120D. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 240 and Xeon Phi 7120D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.