Apple M1 vs Xeon Phi 5120D

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Phi 5120D and Apple M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataApple Apple M-Series
Architecture codenameKnights Corner (2012−2014)no data
Release date17 June 2013 (11 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Phi 5120D and Apple M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores60 (Hexaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2408
Base clock speedno data2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed1.05 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache32 KB (per core)2 MB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache0 KB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography22 nm5 nm
Die size350 mm2no data
Number of transistors5,000 million16000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Phi 5120D and Apple M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketSFF 230-pinno data
Power consumption (TDP)245 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 5120D and Apple M1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Xeon Phi 5120D and Apple M1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 5120D and Apple M1 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 5120D and Apple M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 8-Core GPU

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 June 2013 10 November 2020
Physical cores 60 8
Threads 240 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 5 nm

Xeon Phi 5120D has 650% more physical cores and 2900% more threads.

Apple M1, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Phi 5120D and Apple M1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon Phi 5120D is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Phi 5120D and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Phi 5120D
Xeon Phi 5120D
Apple M1
M1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Phi 5120D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2236 votes

Rate Apple M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Phi 5120D or Apple M1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.