Celeron M 383 vs Xeon L5508
Primary details
Comparing Xeon L5508 and Celeron M 383 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Celeron M |
| Architecture codename | Gainestown (2009−2010) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 (15 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon L5508 and Celeron M 383 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 263 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 731 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon L5508 and Celeron M 383 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | 1366 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 38 Watt | 5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5508 and Celeron M 383. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon L5508 and Celeron M 383 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5508 and Celeron M 383 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5508 and Celeron M 383. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5508 and Celeron M 383.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 38 Watt | 5 Watt |
Xeon L5508 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 383, on the other hand, has 660% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon L5508 and Celeron M 383. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon L5508 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron M 383 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5508 and Celeron M 383, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
