Celeron T3500 vs Xeon L5420
Primary details
Comparing Xeon L5420 and Celeron T3500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2240 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 2.54 | no data |
| Release date | 1 January 2008 (16 years ago) | 1 July 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon L5420 and Celeron T3500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 cache | 12 MB L2 Cache | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 57 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.35V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon L5420 and Celeron T3500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | LGA771 | PGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5420 and Celeron T3500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| FSB parity | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon L5420 and Celeron T3500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5420 and Celeron T3500 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | - | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2008 | 1 July 2010 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
Celeron T3500 has an age advantage of 2 years, and 42.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon L5420 and Celeron T3500. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon L5420 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron T3500 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5420 and Celeron T3500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
