EPYC 72F3 vs Xeon L5335

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5335
2007
4 cores / 4 threads, 50 Watt
1.14
EPYC 72F3
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
17.81
+1462%

EPYC 72F3 outperforms Xeon L5335 by a whopping 1462% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5335 and EPYC 72F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2394366
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.084.64
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency2.089.02
Architecture codenameClovertown (2006−2007)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date13 August 2007 (17 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$380$2,468

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 72F3 has 5700% better value for money than Xeon L5335.

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5335 and EPYC 72F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplierno data37
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (per die)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB L2 Cache256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm+
Die size2x 143 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)60 °Cno data
Number of transistors582 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1.1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5335 and EPYC 72F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketPLGA771SP3
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5335 and EPYC 72F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Xeon L5335 and EPYC 72F3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5335 and EPYC 72F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5335 and EPYC 72F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboardDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5335 and EPYC 72F3.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L5335 1.14
EPYC 72F3 17.81
+1462%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon L5335 1737
EPYC 72F3 27252
+1469%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.14 17.81
Recency 13 August 2007 15 March 2021
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 180 Watt

Xeon L5335 has 260% lower power consumption.

EPYC 72F3, on the other hand, has a 1462.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 72F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon L5335 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5335 and EPYC 72F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5335
Xeon L5335
AMD EPYC 72F3
EPYC 72F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Xeon L5335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 6 votes

Rate EPYC 72F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5335 or EPYC 72F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.