Xeon X5270 vs L5335

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5335
2007
4 cores / 4 threads, 50 Watt
1.09
+13.5%

Xeon L5335 outperforms Xeon X5270 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5335 and Xeon X5270 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24022492
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency2.061.14
Architecture codenameClovertown (2006−2007)no data
Release date13 August 2007 (17 years ago)1 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$380no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5335 and Xeon X5270 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache4 MB (per die)no data
L3 cache8 MB L2 Cache6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size2x 143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data61 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)60 °Cno data
Number of transistors582 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.1V-1.25V0.85V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5335 and Xeon X5270 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketPLGA771LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5335 and Xeon X5270. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-+
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Xeon L5335 and Xeon X5270 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5335 and Xeon X5270 are enumerated here.

VT-x++
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5335 and Xeon X5270. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboardno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L5335 1.09
+13.5%
Xeon X5270 0.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon L5335 1737
+14%
Xeon X5270 1524

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.09 0.96
Recency 13 August 2007 1 July 2008
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 80 Watt

Xeon L5335 has a 13.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 60% lower power consumption.

Xeon X5270, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon L5335 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5270 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5335 and Xeon X5270, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5335
Xeon L5335
Intel Xeon X5270
Xeon X5270

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Xeon L5335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon X5270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5335 or Xeon X5270, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.