3020e vs Xeon L5335

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5335
2007
4 cores / 4 threads, 50 Watt
1.09
3020e
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.53
+40.4%

3020e outperforms Xeon L5335 by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5335 and 3020e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24022123
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.11no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency2.0624.13
Architecture codenameClovertown (2006−2007)Dali (Zen) (2020)
Release date13 August 2007 (17 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$380no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5335 and 3020e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache4 MB (per die)1 MB
L3 cache8 MB L2 Cache4 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size2x 143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)60 °Cno data
Number of transistors582 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1.1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5335 and 3020e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketPLGA771FT5
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5335 and 3020e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Xeon L5335 and 3020e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5335 and 3020e are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5335 and 3020e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboardDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L5335 1.09
3020e 1.53
+40.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon L5335 1737
3020e 2436
+40.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.09 1.53
Recency 13 August 2007 4 August 2020
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon L5335 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

3020e, on the other hand, has a 40.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

The 3020e is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon L5335 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon L5335 is a server/workstation processor while 3020e is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5335 and 3020e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5335
Xeon L5335
AMD 3020e
3020e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Xeon L5335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 812 votes

Rate 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5335 or 3020e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.