Ultra 7 265F vs Xeon Gold 6330N

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6330N and Core Ultra 7 265F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking225not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency13.13no data
Architecture codenameno dataArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date1 April 2021 (3 years ago)January 2025

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6330N and Core Ultra 7 265F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads5620
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data3 MB (per core)
L3 cache42 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6330N and Core Ultra 7 265F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA41891851
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6330N and Core Ultra 7 265F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6330N and Core Ultra 7 265F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6330N and Core Ultra 7 265F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6330N and Core Ultra 7 265F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2667DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6330N and Core Ultra 7 265F.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes6420

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 28 20
Threads 56 20
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon Gold 6330N has 40% more physical cores and 180% more threads.

Ultra 7 265F, on the other hand, has a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 153.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Gold 6330N and Core Ultra 7 265F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6330N is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6330N and Core Ultra 7 265F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6330N
Xeon Gold 6330N
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
Core Ultra 7 265F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6330N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 265F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6330N or Core Ultra 7 265F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.