Ultra 5 245K vs Xeon Gold 6330N

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6330N
2021
28 cores / 56 threads, 165 Watt
22.89
Core Ultra 5 245K
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 125 Watt
27.50
+20.1%

Core Ultra 5 245K outperforms Xeon Gold 6330N by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6330N and Core Ultra 5 245K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking225174
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data73.83
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency13.1320.82
Architecture codenameno dataArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date1 April 2021 (3 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$309

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6330N and Core Ultra 5 245K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads5614
Base clock speed2.2 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rateno data159 MHz
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data3 MB (per core)
L3 cache42 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6330N and Core Ultra 5 245K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA41891851
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6330N and Core Ultra 5 245K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
SIPP-+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6330N and Core Ultra 5 245K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6330N and Core Ultra 5 245K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6330N and Core Ultra 5 245K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2667DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6330N and Core Ultra 5 245K.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes6420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6330N 22.89
Ultra 5 245K 27.50
+20.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6330N 36360
Ultra 5 245K 43682
+20.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.89 27.50
Recency 1 April 2021 24 October 2024
Physical cores 28 14
Threads 56 14
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon Gold 6330N has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Ultra 5 245K, on the other hand, has a 20.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 32% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 5 245K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6330N in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6330N is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 5 245K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6330N and Core Ultra 5 245K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6330N
Xeon Gold 6330N
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
Core Ultra 5 245K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6330N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 19 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 245K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6330N or Core Ultra 5 245K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.