Celeron N5100 vs Xeon Gold 6262V
Aggregate performance score
Celeron N5100 outperforms Xeon Gold 6262V by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Gold 6262V and Celeron N5100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1847 | 1800 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.05 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Xeon Gold | no data |
| Architecture codename | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Jasper Lake (2021) |
| Release date | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) | 11 January 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,900 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Gold 6262V and Celeron N5100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Bus support | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 1.5 MB | no data |
| L2 cache | 24 MB | 1.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 33 MB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 91 °C | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Gold 6262V and Celeron N5100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Socket P | BGA1338 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6262V and Celeron N5100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | no data |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon Gold 6262V and Celeron N5100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6262V and Celeron N5100 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6262V and Celeron N5100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 1 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 6 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 115.212 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6262V and Celeron N5100.
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Celeron N5100 outperforms Xeon Gold 6262V by 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Celeron N5100 outperforms Xeon Gold 6262V by 5% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.04 | 2.15 |
| Recency | 2 April 2019 | 11 January 2021 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 4 |
| Threads | 48 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 6 Watt |
Xeon Gold 6262V has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.
Celeron N5100, on the other hand, has a 5.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 2150% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Gold 6262V and Celeron N5100.
Be aware that Xeon Gold 6262V is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N5100 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6262V and Celeron N5100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
