Opteron 3260 HE vs Xeon Gold 6262V

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6262V
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 135 Watt
1.99
+38.2%
Opteron 3260 HE
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.44

Xeon Gold 6262V outperforms Opteron 3260 HE by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6262V and Opteron 3260 HE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19242179
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.600.61
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency1.403.03
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Zurich (2012)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)20 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,900$125

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Opteron 3260 HE has 2% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6262V.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6262V and Opteron 3260 HE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads484
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier19no data
L1 cache1.5 MB192 KB
L2 cache24 MB4 MB
L3 cache33 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperature91 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6262V and Opteron 3260 HE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6262V and Opteron 3260 HE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6262V and Opteron 3260 HE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6262V and Opteron 3260 HE are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6262V and Opteron 3260 HE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6262V and Opteron 3260 HE.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6262V 1.99
+38.2%
Opteron 3260 HE 1.44

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6262V 3155
+38.2%
Opteron 3260 HE 2283

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.99 1.44
Recency 2 April 2019 20 March 2012
Physical cores 24 4
Threads 48 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 45 Watt

Xeon Gold 6262V has a 38.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Opteron 3260 HE, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 6262V is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 3260 HE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6262V and Opteron 3260 HE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6262V
Xeon Gold 6262V
AMD Opteron 3260 HE
Opteron 3260 HE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 6262V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Opteron 3260 HE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6262V or Opteron 3260 HE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.