i9-11900KF vs Xeon Gold 6258R

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6258R
2020
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.34
+61%
Core i9-11900KF
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 125 Watt
15.74

Xeon Gold 6258R outperforms Core i9-11900KF by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6258R and Core i9-11900KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking195426
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.02no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency11.7011.92
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Rocket Lake (2021)
Release date24 February 2020 (4 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,950no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6258R and Core i9-11900KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads5616
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache1.75 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache28 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature74 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6258R and Core i9-11900KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6258R and Core i9-11900KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6258R and Core i9-11900KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6258R and Core i9-11900KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6258R and Core i9-11900KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1 TB128 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s50 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6258R and Core i9-11900KF.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6258R 25.34
+61%
i9-11900KF 15.74

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6258R 40252
+61%
i9-11900KF 24997

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.34 15.74
Recency 24 February 2020 16 March 2021
Physical cores 28 8
Threads 56 16
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon Gold 6258R has a 61% higher aggregate performance score, and 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads.

i9-11900KF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 64% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 6258R is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-11900KF in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6258R is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-11900KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6258R and Core i9-11900KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6258R
Xeon Gold 6258R
Intel Core i9-11900KF
Core i9-11900KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 20 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6258R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 598 votes

Rate Core i9-11900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6258R or Core i9-11900KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.