Ryzen 5 5500 vs Xeon Gold 6258R

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6258R
2020
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
26.30
+108%

Xeon Gold 6258R outperforms Ryzen 5 5500 by a whopping 108% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6258R and Ryzen 5 5500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking191621
Place by popularitynot in top-1001
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.2351.11
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency11.7017.77
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Cezanne (2021−2024)
Release date24 February 2020 (4 years ago)4 April 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,950$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 5500 has 259% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6258R.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6258R and Ryzen 5 5500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads5612
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache1.75 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache28 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data180 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6258R and Ryzen 5 5500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA3647AM4
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6258R and Ryzen 5 5500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6258R and Ryzen 5 5500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6258R and Ryzen 5 5500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6258R and Ryzen 5 5500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6258R and Ryzen 5 5500.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6258R 26.30
+108%
Ryzen 5 5500 12.67

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6258R 40252
+108%
Ryzen 5 5500 19397

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.30 12.67
Recency 24 February 2020 4 April 2022
Physical cores 28 6
Threads 56 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon Gold 6258R has a 107.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 366.7% more physical cores and 366.7% more threads.

Ryzen 5 5500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 215.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 6258R is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 5500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6258R is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 5500 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6258R and Ryzen 5 5500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6258R
Xeon Gold 6258R
AMD Ryzen 5 5500
Ryzen 5 5500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 20 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6258R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 8209 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6258R or Ryzen 5 5500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.