Apple M2 Max vs Xeon Gold 6242

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6242
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 150 Watt
17.18
Apple M2 Max
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 79 Watt
17.40
+1.3%

Apple M2 Max outperforms Xeon Gold 6242 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6242 and Apple M2 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking391384
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.97no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldApple M-Series
Power efficiency10.4420.08
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)no data
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,529no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6242 and Apple M2 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads3212
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier28no data
L1 cache1 MB3.3 MB
L2 cache16 MB36 MB
L3 cache22 MB48 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data67000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6242 and Apple M2 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647no data
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt79 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6242 and Apple M2 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6242 and Apple M2 Max technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6242 and Apple M2 Max are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6242 and Apple M2 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933no data
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M2 Max 38-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6242 and Apple M2 Max.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6242 17.18
Apple M2 Max 17.40
+1.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6242 26288
Apple M2 Max 26633
+1.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.18 17.40
Recency 2 April 2019 17 January 2023
Physical cores 16 12
Threads 32 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 79 Watt

Xeon Gold 6242 has 33.3% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

Apple M2 Max, on the other hand, has a 1.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 89.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Gold 6242 and Apple M2 Max.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6242 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 Max is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6242 and Apple M2 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6242
Xeon Gold 6242
Apple M2 Max
M2 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 11 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6242 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 232 votes

Rate Apple M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6242 or Apple M2 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.