i9-13900KF vs Xeon Gold 6209U

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6209U
2019
20 cores / 40 threads, 125 Watt
16.01
Core i9-13900KF
2022
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
36.67
+129%

Core i9-13900KF outperforms Xeon Gold 6209U by a whopping 129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6209U and Core i9-13900KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking42393
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.2164.62
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldIntel Core i9
Power efficiency12.1213.72
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,350$564

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900KF has 275% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6209U.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6209U and Core i9-13900KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads4032
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplier2130
L1 cache1.25 MB1.5 MB
L2 cache20 MB16 MB
L3 cache27.5 MB12 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature87 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6209U and Core i9-13900KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt125 W, 253 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6209U and Core i9-13900KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6209U and Core i9-13900KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6209U and Core i9-13900KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6209U and Core i9-13900KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1 TB192 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s89.604 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6209U and Core i9-13900KF.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes4820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6209U 16.01
i9-13900KF 36.67
+129%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6209U 25430
i9-13900KF 58253
+129%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.01 36.67
Recency 2 April 2019 27 September 2022
Physical cores 20 24
Threads 40 32

Xeon Gold 6209U has 25% more threads.

i9-13900KF, on the other hand, has a 129% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 20% more physical cores.

The Core i9-13900KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6209U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6209U is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-13900KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6209U and Core i9-13900KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6209U
Xeon Gold 6209U
Intel Core i9-13900KF
Core i9-13900KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6209U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 642 votes

Rate Core i9-13900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6209U or Core i9-13900KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.