i9-13900KF vs Xeon W-3235

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3235
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
16.71
Core i9-13900KF
2022
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
38.14
+128%

Core i9-13900KF outperforms Xeon W-3235 by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3235 and Core i9-13900KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking40991
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.9964.80
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon WIntel Core i9
Power efficiency8.4713.75
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,398$564

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900KF has 260% better value for money than Xeon W-3235.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3235 and Core i9-13900KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads2432
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplier3330
L1 cache768 KB1.5 MB
L2 cache12 MB16 MB
L3 cache19.25 MB12 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3235 and Core i9-13900KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt125 W, 253 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3235 and Core i9-13900KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3235 and Core i9-13900KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3235 and Core i9-13900KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3235 and Core i9-13900KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1 TB192 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s89.604 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3235 and Core i9-13900KF.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes6420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3235 16.71
i9-13900KF 38.14
+128%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3235 25578
i9-13900KF 58376
+128%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-3235 1447
i9-13900KF 2918
+102%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-3235 10448
i9-13900KF 19657
+88.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.71 38.14
Recency 3 June 2019 27 September 2022
Physical cores 12 24
Threads 24 32
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 125 Watt

i9-13900KF has a 128.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 44% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-13900KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3235 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3235 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-13900KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3235 and Core i9-13900KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3235
Xeon W-3235
Intel Core i9-13900KF
Core i9-13900KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 22 votes

Rate Xeon W-3235 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 625 votes

Rate Core i9-13900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3235 or Core i9-13900KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.