Xeon E5-2680 vs Gold 6152

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6152
2017
22 cores / 44 threads, 140 Watt
16.48
+173%
Xeon E5-2680
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 130 Watt
6.03

Xeon Gold 6152 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 by a whopping 173% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6152 and Xeon E5-2680 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4081096
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.690.81
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldXeon (Desktop)
Power efficiency10.934.31
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)6 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,655$1,723

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6152 has 356% better value for money than Xeon E5-2680.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6152 and Xeon E5-2680 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores22 (Docosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4416
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache1.375 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache22 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache30.25 MB20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data435 mm2
Maximum core temperature92 °C85 °C
Number of transistorsno data2,270 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6152 and Xeon E5-2680 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6152 and Xeon E5-2680. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6152 and Xeon E5-2680 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6152 and Xeon E5-2680 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6152 and Xeon E5-2680. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GB384 GB
Max memory channels64
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s51.2 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6152 and Xeon E5-2680.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4840

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6152 16.48
+173%
Xeon E5-2680 6.03

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6152 25693
+173%
Xeon E5-2680 9399

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.48 6.03
Recency 25 April 2017 6 March 2012
Physical cores 22 8
Threads 44 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 130 Watt

Xeon Gold 6152 has a 173.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 175% more physical cores and 175% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5-2680, on the other hand, has 7.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 6152 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2680 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6152 and Xeon E5-2680, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6152
Xeon Gold 6152
Intel Xeon E5-2680
Xeon E5-2680

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 8 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6152 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 123 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6152 or Xeon E5-2680, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.