Xeon Platinum 8180 vs E5-2680

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2680
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 130 Watt
5.92
Xeon Platinum 8180
2017
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
24.09
+307%

Xeon Platinum 8180 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 by a whopping 307% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2680 and Xeon Platinum 8180 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1098206
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.811.94
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesXeon (Desktop)Intel Xeon Platinum
Power efficiency4.3111.12
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)11 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,723$10,009

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Platinum 8180 has 140% better value for money than Xeon E5-2680.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2680 and Xeon Platinum 8180 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads1656
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data25
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)38.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size435 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature85 °C84 °C
Number of transistors2,270 million8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2680 and Xeon Platinum 8180 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration28 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 and Xeon Platinum 8180. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2680 and Xeon Platinum 8180 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 and Xeon Platinum 8180 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 and Xeon Platinum 8180. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size384 GB768 GB
Max memory channels46
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 and Xeon Platinum 8180.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4048

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2680 5.92
Xeon Platinum 8180 24.09
+307%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2680 9399
Xeon Platinum 8180 38259
+307%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2680 538
Xeon Platinum 8180 1273
+137%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2680 3391
Xeon Platinum 8180 11411
+237%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.92 24.09
Recency 6 March 2012 11 July 2017
Physical cores 8 28
Threads 16 56
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 205 Watt

Xeon E5-2680 has 57.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8180, on the other hand, has a 306.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Platinum 8180 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2680 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 and Xeon Platinum 8180, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2680
Xeon E5-2680
Intel Xeon Platinum 8180
Xeon Platinum 8180

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 123 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 13 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8180 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2680 or Xeon Platinum 8180, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.