EPYC 9174F vs Xeon Gold 6134

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6134
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 130 Watt
10.46
EPYC 9174F
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 320 Watt
34.93
+234%

EPYC 9174F outperforms Xeon Gold 6134 by a whopping 234% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 9174F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking739105
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.736.73
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldAMD EPYC
Power efficiency7.6110.33
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,214$3,850

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9174F has 147% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6134.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 9174F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed3.2 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3241
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache24.75 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data8x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 9174F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647SP5
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 9174F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 9174F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 9174F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 9174F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size768 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 9174F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6134 10.46
EPYC 9174F 34.93
+234%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6134 16614
EPYC 9174F 55485
+234%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon Gold 6134 1234
EPYC 9174F 2214
+79.4%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon Gold 6134 7293
EPYC 9174F 16965
+133%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.46 34.93
Recency 25 April 2017 10 November 2022
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 320 Watt

Xeon Gold 6134 has 146.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9174F, on the other hand, has a 233.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9174F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6134 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 9174F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6134
Xeon Gold 6134
AMD EPYC 9174F
EPYC 9174F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6134 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 9174F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6134 or EPYC 9174F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.