EPYC 9174F vs EPYC 7443

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7443
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 200 Watt
35.63
+2%
EPYC 9174F
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 320 Watt
34.93

EPYC 7443 outperforms EPYC 9174F by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7443 and EPYC 9174F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking105106
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.957.10
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency16.8610.33
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,010$3,850

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7443 has 125% better value for money than EPYC 9174F.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7443 and EPYC 9174F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4832
Base clock speed2.85 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplier28.541
L1 cache1536 KB1 MB
L2 cache12 MB16 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+5 nm, 6 nm
Die size4x 81 mm28x 72 mm2
Number of transistors16,600 million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7443 and EPYC 9174F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP3SP5
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7443 and EPYC 9174F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7443 and EPYC 9174F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7443 and EPYC 9174F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 TiB6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7443 and EPYC 9174F.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7443 35.63
+2%
EPYC 9174F 34.93

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7443 56601
+2%
EPYC 9174F 55485

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.63 34.93
Recency 12 January 2021 10 November 2022
Physical cores 24 16
Threads 48 32
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 320 Watt

EPYC 7443 has a 2% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and 60% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9174F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7443 and EPYC 9174F.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7443 and EPYC 9174F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7443
EPYC 7443
AMD EPYC 9174F
EPYC 9174F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 6 votes

Rate EPYC 7443 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 9174F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7443 or EPYC 9174F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.