FX-770K vs Xeon Gold 5317

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5317
2021
12 cores / 24 threads, 150 Watt
17.24
+793%
FX-770K
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.93

Xeon Gold 5317 outperforms FX-770K by a whopping 793% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5317 and FX-770K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3701966
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency10.882.81
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)December 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5317 and FX-770K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads244
Base clock speed3 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)256K
L2 cache1 MB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache18 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography10 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data245 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)84 °C72 °C
Number of transistorsno data2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5317 and FX-770K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4189FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5317 and FX-770K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5317 and FX-770K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5317 and FX-770K are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5317 and FX-770K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR3-2133
Maximum memory size6 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5317 and FX-770K.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes6416

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 5317 17.24
+793%
FX-770K 1.93

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5317 27387
+795%
FX-770K 3060

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.24 1.93
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 4
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon Gold 5317 has a 793.3% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

FX-770K, on the other hand, has 130.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 5317 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-770K in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 5317 is a server/workstation processor while FX-770K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5317 and FX-770K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5317
Xeon Gold 5317
AMD FX-770K
FX-770K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 20 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5317 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 7 votes

Rate FX-770K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5317 or FX-770K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.