Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Celeron N4000C

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N4000C
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.89
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
39.35
+4321%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Celeron N4000C by a whopping 4321% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N4000C and Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking256068
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data56.78
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiency14.0431.03
Architecture codenameno dataRaphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
Release date1 April 2019 (5 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N4000C and Ryzen 9 7950X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed1.1 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rateno data64K (per core)
L1 cacheno data1024 KB
L2 cacheno data16 MB
L3 cache4 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data71+71+122 mm
Maximum core temperature105 deg C89 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistorsno data13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N4000C and Ryzen 9 7950X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1090AM5
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4000C and Ryzen 9 7950X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.286x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron N4000C and Ryzen 9 7950X3D technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4000C and Ryzen 9 7950X3D are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4000C and Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/sDDR5-5200
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency650 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4000C and Ryzen 9 7950X3D integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4000C and Ryzen 9 7950X3D integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4000C and Ryzen 9 7950X3D integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4000C and Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes624
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N4000C 0.89
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 39.35
+4321%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N4000C 1406
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 62509
+4346%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.89 39.35
Integrated graphics card 0.87 4.43
Recency 1 April 2019 4 January 2023
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 120 Watt

Celeron N4000C has 1900% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D, on the other hand, has a 4321.3% higher aggregate performance score, 409.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4000C in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N4000C is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 7950X3D is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4000C and Ryzen 9 7950X3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N4000C
Celeron N4000C
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 37 votes

Rate Celeron N4000C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1439 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7950X3D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N4000C or Ryzen 9 7950X3D, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.