Celeron 925 vs Xeon Gold 5218

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5218 and Celeron 925 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking541not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.80no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency10.32no data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)no data
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)1 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,273no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5218 and Celeron 925 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)no data
Threads32no data
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHzno data
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache1 MBno data
L2 cache16 MBno data
L3 cache22 MB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature87 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5218 and Celeron 925 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647no data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5218 and Celeron 925. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5218 and Celeron 925 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5218 and Celeron 925 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5218 and Celeron 925. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2667no data
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5218 and Celeron 925.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5218 21651
+4439%
Celeron 925 477

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2019 1 January 2011
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon Gold 5218 has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 925, on the other hand, has 257.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Gold 5218 and Celeron 925. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 5218 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 925 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5218 and Celeron 925, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5218
Xeon Gold 5218
Intel Celeron 925
Celeron 925

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 22 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5218 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5218 or Celeron 925, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.