i5-12400F vs Xeon E7-8890 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E7-8890 v4
2016
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
1.29
Core i5-12400F
2022
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
12.29
+853%

Core i5-12400F outperforms Xeon E7-8890 v4 by a whopping 853% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E7-8890 v4 and Core i5-12400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2282629
Place by popularitynot in top-1002
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0146.19
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E7no data
Power efficiency0.7417.80
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,174$180

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-12400F has 461800% better value for money than Xeon E7-8890 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E7-8890 v4 and Core i5-12400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads4812
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate3 × 9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache60 MB18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data163 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E7-8890 v4 and Core i5-12400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7-8890 v4 and Core i5-12400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E7-8890 v4 and Core i5-12400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7-8890 v4 and Core i5-12400F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E7-8890 v4 and Core i5-12400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size3 TB128 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth85 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E7-8890 v4 and Core i5-12400F.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes3220

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E7-8890 v4 1.29
i5-12400F 12.29
+853%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E7-8890 v4 2054
i5-12400F 19521
+850%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.29 12.29
Recency 20 June 2016 4 January 2022
Physical cores 24 6
Threads 48 12
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E7-8890 v4 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

i5-12400F, on the other hand, has a 852.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and 153.8% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-12400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E7-8890 v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E7-8890 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-12400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E7-8890 v4 and Core i5-12400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E7-8890 v4
Xeon E7-8890 v4
Intel Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 28 votes

Rate Xeon E7-8890 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 13909 votes

Rate Core i5-12400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E7-8890 v4 or Core i5-12400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.