i5-9400F vs Xeon E5-4620 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-4620 v3
2015
10 cores / 20 threads, 105 Watt
6.63
+11.2%
Core i5-9400F
2019
6 cores / 6 threads, 65 Watt
5.96

Xeon E5-4620 v3 outperforms Core i5-9400F by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Core i5-9400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10311096
Place by popularitynot in top-10025
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.07
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i5
Power efficiency5.988.68
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Release date1 June 2015 (9 years ago)8 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$182

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Core i5-9400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads206
Base clock speed2 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data29
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache25 MB (shared)9 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size356 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)78 °C72 °C
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Core i5-9400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Core i5-9400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Core i5-9400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Core i5-9400F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Core i5-9400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size768 GB128 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Core i5-9400F.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4620 v3 6.63
+11.2%
i5-9400F 5.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-4620 v3 10525
+11.1%
i5-9400F 9470

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.63 5.96
Recency 1 June 2015 8 January 2019
Physical cores 10 6
Threads 20 6
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5-4620 v3 has a 11.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 66.7% more physical cores and 233.3% more threads.

i5-9400F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 61.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-4620 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-9400F in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-4620 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-9400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Core i5-9400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4620 v3
Xeon E5-4620 v3
Intel Core i5-9400F
Core i5-9400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 22 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4620 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 56649 votes

Rate Core i5-9400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4620 v3 or Core i5-9400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.