Xeon E5-2620 v3 vs i5-9400F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-9400F
2019
6 cores / 6 threads, 65 Watt
5.98
+21.3%
Xeon E5-2620 v3
2014
6 cores / 12 threads, 85 Watt
4.93

Core i5-9400F outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-9400F and Xeon E5-2620 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10941230
Place by popularity25not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.10no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Power efficiency8.675.47
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Release date7 January 2019 (5 years ago)8 September 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$182no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-9400F and Xeon E5-2620 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads612
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache385 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache9 MB (shared)15 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size149 mm2356 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C73 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-9400F and Xeon E5-2620 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon E5-2620 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit

Security technologies

Core i5-9400F and Xeon E5-2620 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon E5-2620 v3 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon E5-2620 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866
Maximum memory size128 GB768 GB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s59 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon E5-2620 v3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1640

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-9400F 5.98
+21.3%
Xeon E5-2620 v3 4.93

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-9400F 9470
+21.3%
Xeon E5-2620 v3 7808

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-9400F 1403
+47.7%
Xeon E5-2620 v3 950

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-9400F 4897
+18.6%
Xeon E5-2620 v3 4128

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.98 4.93
Recency 7 January 2019 8 September 2014
Threads 6 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 85 Watt

i5-9400F has a 21.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 30.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-2620 v3, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

The Core i5-9400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2620 v3 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-9400F is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2620 v3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-9400F and Xeon E5-2620 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-9400F
Core i5-9400F
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
Xeon E5-2620 v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 56630 votes

Rate Core i5-9400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2737 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2620 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-9400F or Xeon E5-2620 v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.