EPYC 8024P vs Xeon E5-2698 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2698 v4
2016
20 cores / 40 threads, 135 Watt
15.29
+13.8%

Xeon E5-2698 v4 outperforms EPYC 8024P by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2698 v4 and EPYC 8024P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking476580
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.8821.37
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency10.3313.61
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Siena (2023−2024)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)18 September 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,226$409

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 8024P has 642% better value for money than Xeon E5-2698 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2698 v4 and EPYC 8024P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4016
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache5 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache50 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size456.12 mm273 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data75 °C
Number of transistors7200 Million8,875 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2698 v4 and EPYC 8024P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011SP6
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt90 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2698 v4 and EPYC 8024P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2698 v4 and EPYC 8024P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2698 v4 and EPYC 8024P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2698 v4 and EPYC 8024P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR5
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2698 v4 and EPYC 8024P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4096

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2698 v4 15.29
+13.8%
EPYC 8024P 13.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2698 v4 23400
+13.8%
EPYC 8024P 20556

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.29 13.43
Recency 20 June 2016 18 September 2023
Physical cores 20 8
Threads 40 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 90 Watt

Xeon E5-2698 v4 has a 13.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads.

EPYC 8024P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2698 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 8024P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2698 v4 and EPYC 8024P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4
Xeon E5-2698 v4
AMD EPYC 8024P
EPYC 8024P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 117 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2698 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8024P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2698 v4 or EPYC 8024P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.