EPYC 8024P vs Xeon E5-2686 v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2686 v4
2016
18 cores / 36 threads, 145 Watt
12.77
EPYC 8024P
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
12.94
+1.3%

EPYC 8024P outperforms Xeon E5-2686 v4 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2686 v4 and EPYC 8024P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking595583
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.47
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency8.3313.61
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Siena (2023−2024)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)18 September 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$409

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2686 v4 and EPYC 8024P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3616
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier23no data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4.5 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache45 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size456.12 mm273 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data75 °C
Number of transistors7200 Million8,875 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2686 v4 and EPYC 8024P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
Socketno dataSP6
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt90 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2686 v4 and EPYC 8024P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2686 v4 and EPYC 8024P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2686 v4 and EPYC 8024P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2686 v4 and EPYC 8024P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
Maximum memory size1,536 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2686 v4 and EPYC 8024P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4096

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2686 v4 12.77
EPYC 8024P 12.94
+1.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2686 v4 20289
EPYC 8024P 20556
+1.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.77 12.94
Recency 20 June 2016 18 September 2023
Physical cores 18 8
Threads 36 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 90 Watt

Xeon E5-2686 v4 has 125% more physical cores and 125% more threads.

EPYC 8024P, on the other hand, has a 1.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 61.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E5-2686 v4 and EPYC 8024P.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2686 v4 and EPYC 8024P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2686 v4
Xeon E5-2686 v4
AMD EPYC 8024P
EPYC 8024P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 216 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2686 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8024P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2686 v4 or EPYC 8024P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.