EPYC Embedded 3101 vs Xeon E5-2697 v2

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697 v2 and EPYC Embedded 3101 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking847not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.92no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)AMD EPYC Embedded
Power efficiency6.54no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,723no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697 v2 and EPYC Embedded 3101 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads244
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus rate8GT/sno data
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache64K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache30 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million4800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697 v2 and EPYC Embedded 3101 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011AMD BGA SP4r2
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and EPYC Embedded 3101. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697 v2 and EPYC Embedded 3101 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and EPYC Embedded 3101 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and EPYC Embedded 3101. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size768 GB512 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and EPYC Embedded 3101.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4032

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2013 21 February 2018
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2697 v2 has 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

EPYC Embedded 3101, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 271.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2697 v2 and EPYC Embedded 3101. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697 v2 and EPYC Embedded 3101, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
Xeon E5-2697 v2
AMD EPYC Embedded 3101
EPYC Embedded 3101

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 758 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2697 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 3101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2697 v2 or EPYC Embedded 3101, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.