Pentium D 965 EE vs C-30
Primary details
Comparing C-30 and Pentium D 965 EE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD C-Series | no data |
| Architecture codename | Ontario (2011−2012) | Presler (2005−2007) |
| Release date | 4 January 2011 (13 years ago) | March 2006 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
C-30 and Pentium D 965 EE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3.73 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 28 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | 140 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 376 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on C-30 and Pentium D 965 EE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | 775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-30 and Pentium D 965 EE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 40 nm, 1.24-1.35V | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-30 and Pentium D 965 EE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-30 and Pentium D 965 EE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 Single-channel | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6250 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 130 Watt |
C-30 has a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 1344.4% lower power consumption.
Pentium D 965 EE, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
We couldn't decide between C-30 and Pentium D 965 EE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that C-30 is a notebook processor while Pentium D 965 EE is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between C-30 and Pentium D 965 EE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
