EPYC 9174F vs Xeon E5-2690

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2690
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 135 Watt
6.13
EPYC 9174F
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 320 Watt
34.93
+470%

EPYC 9174F outperforms Xeon E5-2690 by a whopping 470% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2690 and EPYC 9174F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1082105
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.766.73
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency4.3010.33
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$397$3,850

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9174F has 79% better value for money than Xeon E5-2690.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2690 and EPYC 9174F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed2.9 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data41
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache20480 KB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size435 mm28x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,270 million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2690 and EPYC 9174F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA2011SP5
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2690 and EPYC 9174F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2690 and EPYC 9174F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2690 and EPYC 9174F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2690 and EPYC 9174F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size384 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2690 and EPYC 9174F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes40128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2690 6.13
EPYC 9174F 34.93
+470%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2690 9734
EPYC 9174F 55485
+470%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2690 584
EPYC 9174F 2214
+279%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2690 3447
EPYC 9174F 16965
+392%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.13 34.93
Recency 6 March 2012 10 November 2022
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 320 Watt

Xeon E5-2690 has 137% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9174F, on the other hand, has a 469.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9174F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2690 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2690 and EPYC 9174F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2690
Xeon E5-2690
AMD EPYC 9174F
EPYC 9174F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 610 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 9174F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2690 or EPYC 9174F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.