Atom x7-E3950 vs Xeon E5-2690 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2690 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 135 Watt
12.26
+948%
Atom x7-E3950
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.17

Xeon E5-2690 v4 outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by a whopping 948% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Atom x7-E3950 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6212354
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.98no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E57x Intel Atom
Power efficiency8.599.23
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)30 August 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,090$57

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Atom x7-E3950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads284
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier26no data
L1 cacheno data56K (per core)
L2 cache3.5 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache35 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size306.18 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature89 °C110 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data103 °C
Number of transistors4700 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Atom x7-E3950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011Intel BGA 1296
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Atom x7-E3950. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Atom x7-E3950 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Atom x7-E3950 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Atom x7-E3950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size1.5 TB8 GB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 505

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Atom x7-E3950.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes404

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2690 v4 12.26
+948%
Atom x7-E3950 1.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2690 v4 19471
+945%
Atom x7-E3950 1864

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2690 v4 1067
+362%
Atom x7-E3950 231

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2690 v4 7458
+939%
Atom x7-E3950 718

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.26 1.17
Recency 20 June 2016 30 August 2014
Physical cores 14 4
Threads 28 4
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 12 Watt

Xeon E5-2690 v4 has a 947.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 250% more physical cores and 600% more threads.

Atom x7-E3950, on the other hand, has 1025% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2690 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x7-E3950 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2690 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Atom x7-E3950 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Atom x7-E3950, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
Xeon E5-2690 v4
Intel Atom x7-E3950
Atom x7-E3950

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 1658 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2690 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 48 votes

Rate Atom x7-E3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2690 v4 or Atom x7-E3950, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.