Celeron J1900 vs Xeon E5-2682 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2682 v4
2016
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
11.77
+1535%
Celeron J1900
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.72

Xeon E5-2682 v4 outperforms Celeron J1900 by a whopping 1535% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Celeron J1900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6642697
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Celeron
Power efficiency9.286.81
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$82

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Celeron J1900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads324
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.42 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cacheno data224 KB
L2 cache4 MB2 MB
L3 cache40 MB2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size456.12 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors7200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Celeron J1900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
Socketno dataFCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Celeron J1900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX+-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data-
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Celeron J1900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Celeron J1900 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Celeron J1900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory size1,536 GB8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data854 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Celeron J1900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Celeron J1900.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes404

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2682 v4 11.77
+1535%
Celeron J1900 0.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2682 v4 18702
+1528%
Celeron J1900 1149

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.77 0.72
Recency 20 June 2016 1 November 2013
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 32 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon E5-2682 v4 has a 1534.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron J1900, on the other hand, has 1100% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2682 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1900 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2682 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron J1900 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Celeron J1900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2682 v4
Xeon E5-2682 v4
Intel Celeron J1900
Celeron J1900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 132 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2682 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 196 votes

Rate Celeron J1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2682 v4 or Celeron J1900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.