Xeon E7220 vs E5-2640
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E7220 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1427 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.66 | no data |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Power efficiency | 3.94 | no data |
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) | no data |
Release date | 6 March 2012 (12 years ago) | 1 July 2007 (17 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $162 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E7220 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | no data |
Threads | 12 | no data |
Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.93 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | no data |
Bus rate | 7.2 GT/s | no data |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | no data |
L3 cache | 15360 KB (shared) | 8 MB L2 Cache |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
Die size | 435 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 73 °C | 64 °C |
Number of transistors | 2,270 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | no data | 1.0V-1.5V |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E7220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
Socket | FCLGA2011 | PPGA604 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E7220. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
Idle States | + | + |
Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
Flex Memory Access | - | no data |
Demand Based Switching | + | + |
FSB parity | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E7220 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | - |
EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E7220 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E7220. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 384 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.6 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E7220.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 40 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 6 March 2012 | 1 July 2007 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 80 Watt |
Xeon E5-2640 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.
Xeon E7220, on the other hand, has 18.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E7220. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E7220, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.