Core 2 Duo T5550 vs Xeon E5-2640 v4

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Core 2 Duo T5550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking942not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.70no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency8.27no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$939no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Core 2 Duo T5550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads202
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.83 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 8 GT/s667 MHz
Multiplier24no data
L2 cache2.5 MB2 MB
L3 cache25 MB2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size246.24 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °C100 °C
Number of transistors3200 Million291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.075V-1.25V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Core 2 Duo T5550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA2011PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Core 2 Duo T5550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE46 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Core 2 Duo T5550 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Core 2 Duo T5550 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Core 2 Duo T5550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133no data
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.3 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Core 2 Duo T5550.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 12488
+1845%
Core 2 Duo T5550 642

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 1047
+361%
Core 2 Duo T5550 227

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 5641
+1276%
Core 2 Duo T5550 410

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2016 1 January 2008
Physical cores 10 2
Threads 20 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2640 v4 has an age advantage of 8 years, 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Duo T5550, on the other hand, has 157.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Core 2 Duo T5550. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2640 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Duo T5550 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Core 2 Duo T5550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4
Xeon E5-2640 v4
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550
Core 2 Duo T5550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 933 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 57 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T5550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 v4 or Core 2 Duo T5550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.