Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Xeon E5-2640 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2640 v4
2016
10 cores / 20 threads, 90 Watt
7.88
+1733%
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.43

Xeon E5-2640 v4 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1400 by a whopping 1733% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9552975
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.76no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency8.291.16
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Merom-2M (2008)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 May 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$939no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads202
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz1.73 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 8 GT/s533 MHz
Multiplier24no data
L2 cache2.5 MB512 KB
L3 cache25 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size246.24 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature76 °C100 °C
Number of transistors3200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA2011P
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133no data
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.3 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.88 0.43
Recency 20 June 2016 1 May 2008
Physical cores 10 2
Threads 20 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2640 v4 has a 1732.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400, on the other hand, has 157.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2640 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2640 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4
Xeon E5-2640 v4
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Celeron Dual-Core T1400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 975 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 285 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 v4 or Celeron Dual-Core T1400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.