Apple M2 Max vs Xeon D-1713NT
Primary details
Comparing Xeon D-1713NT and Apple M2 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 384 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | no data | Apple M-Series |
Power efficiency | no data | 20.08 |
Release date | 1 January 2022 (2 years ago) | 17 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon D-1713NT and Apple M2 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 12 |
Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.424 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 3.3 MB |
L2 cache | no data | 36 MB |
L3 cache | 10 MB | 48 MB |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
Number of transistors | no data | 67000 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon D-1713NT and Apple M2 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | FCBGA2227 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 79 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1713NT and Apple M2 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
QuickAssist | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon D-1713NT and Apple M2 Max technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
SGX | Yes with Intel® SPS | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1713NT and Apple M2 Max are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1713NT and Apple M2 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 256 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1713NT and Apple M2 Max.
PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
USB revision | 3.0 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 24 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 4 | no data |
Integrated LAN | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 January 2022 | 17 January 2023 |
Physical cores | 4 | 12 |
Threads | 8 | 12 |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 79 Watt |
Xeon D-1713NT has 75.6% lower power consumption.
Apple M2 Max, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 200% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon D-1713NT and Apple M2 Max. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon D-1713NT is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 Max is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1713NT and Apple M2 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.