EPYC 4364P vs Xeon D-1587

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-1587
2016
16 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
8.54
EPYC 4364P
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
22.61
+165%

EPYC 4364P outperforms Xeon D-1587 by a whopping 165% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1587 and EPYC 4364P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking894234
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.1145.96
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Dno data
Power efficiency12.4320.38
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date24 February 2016 (8 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,443$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4364P has 2078% better value for money than Xeon D-1587.

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1587 and EPYC 4364P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed1.7 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Multiplier17no data
L1 cache1 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size306.18 mm271 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)80 °C61 °C
Number of transistors4700 Million6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1587 and EPYC 4364P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1667AM5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1587 and EPYC 4364P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
GPIO+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon D-1587 and EPYC 4364P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1587 and EPYC 4364P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1587 and EPYC 4364P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.124 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1587 and EPYC 4364P.

PCIe version2.0/3.05.0
PCI Express lanes2428
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN+no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-1587 8.54
EPYC 4364P 22.61
+165%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon D-1587 13566
EPYC 4364P 35909
+165%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.54 22.61
Recency 24 February 2016 21 May 2024
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 105 Watt

Xeon D-1587 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 61.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4364P, on the other hand, has a 164.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4364P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-1587 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1587 and EPYC 4364P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1587
Xeon D-1587
AMD EPYC 4364P
EPYC 4364P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1587 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4364P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1587 or EPYC 4364P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.