Atom N550 vs Xeon E5-1650 v4

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Atom N550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking986not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.39no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Atom
Power efficiency4.87no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)23 August 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$617$86

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Atom N550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads124
Base clock speed3.6 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate5 GT/s666 MHz
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache15 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size246.24 mm287 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)69 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,400 million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Atom N550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt8.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Atom N550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Atom N550 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Atom N550 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Atom N550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TB2 GB
Max memory channels41
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 3150

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Atom N550.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1650 v4 11451
+3946%
Atom N550 283

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-1650 v4 1188
+1756%
Atom N550 64

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-1650 v4 5475
+3783%
Atom N550 141

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2016 23 August 2010
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 8 Watt

Xeon E5-1650 v4 has an age advantage of 5 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N550, on the other hand, has 1650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Atom N550. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Atom N550 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Atom N550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Intel Atom N550
Atom N550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 455 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1650 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 46 votes

Rate Atom N550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1650 v4 or Atom N550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.