Xeon LC3518 vs 6756E

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 6756E and Xeon LC3518 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameSierra Forest (2024)Jasper Forest (2010)
Release date3 June 2024 (less than a year ago)11 February 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,428$192

Detailed specifications

Xeon 6756E and Xeon LC3518 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1281 (Single-Core)
Threads1281
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.73 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (per module)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache96 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm45 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)80 °C95 °C
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 6756E and Xeon LC3518 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket47101366
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt23 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 6756E and Xeon LC3518. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Xeon 6756E and Xeon LC3518 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 6756E and Xeon LC3518 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 6756E and Xeon LC3518. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 6756E and Xeon LC3518.

PCIe version5.02.0
PCI Express lanes88no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2024 11 February 2010
Physical cores 128 1
Threads 128 1
Chip lithography 5 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 23 Watt

Xeon 6756E has an age advantage of 14 years, 12700% more physical cores and 12700% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon LC3518, on the other hand, has 878.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon 6756E and Xeon LC3518. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 6756E and Xeon LC3518, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 6756E
Xeon 6756E
Intel Xeon LC3518
Xeon LC3518

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6756E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon LC3518 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 6756E or Xeon LC3518, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.