K6-2+ 450ACZ vs Xeon 6710E
Primary details
Comparing Xeon 6710E and K6-2+ 450ACZ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Sierra Forest (2024) | Sharptooth (2000) |
| Release date | 3 June 2024 (less than a year ago) | 18 April 2000 (24 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,749 | $85 |
Detailed specifications
Xeon 6710E and K6-2+ 450ACZ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 0.45 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (per module) | 128 KB |
| L3 cache | 96 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 180 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 85 °C | 85 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 21 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 6710E and K6-2+ 450ACZ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | 4710 | AMD Super Socket 7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 13 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 6710E and K6-2+ 450ACZ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon 6710E and K6-2+ 450ACZ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 6710E and K6-2+ 450ACZ are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 6710E and K6-2+ 450ACZ. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | unknown Depends on motherboard |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 6710E and K6-2+ 450ACZ.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 88 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 June 2024 | 18 April 2000 |
| Physical cores | 64 | 1 |
| Threads | 64 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 13 Watt |
Xeon 6710E has an age advantage of 24 years, 6300% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 3500% more advanced lithography process.
K6-2+ 450ACZ, on the other hand, has 1476.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon 6710E and K6-2+ 450ACZ. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon 6710E is a server/workstation processor while K6-2+ 450ACZ is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 6710E and K6-2+ 450ACZ, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
