Apple M2 Max vs Xeon 2.8

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 2.8 and Apple M2 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated384
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M-Series
Power efficiencyno data20.08
Architecture codenamePaxville (2002−2005)no data
Release dateSeptember 2002 (22 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon 2.8 and Apple M2 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speedno data2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache16 KB3.3 MB
L2 cache512K36 MB
L3 cache0 KB48 MB
Chip lithography130 nm5 nm
Die size217 mm2no data
Number of transistors200 million67000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 2.8 and Apple M2 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
Socket604no data
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt79 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 2.8 and Apple M2 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M2 Max 38-Core GPU

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 130 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 79 Watt

Apple M2 Max has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 2500% more advanced lithography process, and 70.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon 2.8 and Apple M2 Max. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon 2.8 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 Max is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 2.8 and Apple M2 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 2.8
Xeon 2.8
Apple M2 Max
M2 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 2.8 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 232 votes

Rate Apple M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 2.8 or Apple M2 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.