Xeon Platinum 8376H vs 2.0
Primary details
Comparing Xeon 2.0 and Xeon Platinum 8376H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Architecture codename | Prestonia (2002) | Cooper Lake-SP (2021) |
| Release date | February 2002 (22 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon 2.0 and Xeon Platinum 8376H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 28 (Octacosa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 56 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 38.5 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 217 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 55 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 2.0 and Xeon Platinum 8376H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 8 |
| Socket | 604 | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 2.0 and Xeon Platinum 8376H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Xeon 2.0 and Xeon Platinum 8376H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 2.0 and Xeon Platinum 8376H are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 2.0 and Xeon Platinum 8376H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 RDIMM |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1.12 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 2.0 and Xeon Platinum 8376H.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 28 |
| Threads | 1 | 56 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 205 Watt |
Xeon 2.0 has 130.3% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8376H, on the other hand, has 2700% more physical cores and 5500% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon 2.0 and Xeon Platinum 8376H. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 2.0 and Xeon Platinum 8376H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
