Iris Graphics 48 vs Pentium M 1.60

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 1.60 and Iris Graphics 48 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3358not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Iris Graphics
Power efficiency0.47no data
Architecture codenameBanias (2003)Gen9
Release dateMarch 2003 (21 year ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 1.60 and Iris Graphics 48 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)no data
Threads1no data
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz0.3 GHz
L1 cache16 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography130 nm14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm
Die size100 mm2no data
Number of transistors77 millionno data
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 1.60 and Iris Graphics 48 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket478no data
Power consumption (TDP)24 Wattno data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 1.60 and Iris Graphics 48. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2no data
Maximum memory sizeno data65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm

Iris Graphics 48 has a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Pentium M 1.60 and Iris Graphics 48. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 1.60 and Iris Graphics 48, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 1.60
Pentium M 1.60
Intel Iris Graphics 48
Iris Graphics 48

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 10 votes

Rate Pentium M 1.60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 5 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 1.60 or Iris Graphics 48, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.