Ryzen 5 7535HS vs VIA Nano U2250

VS

Aggregate performance score

VIA Nano U2250
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 10 Watt
0.11
Ryzen 5 7535HS
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 35 Watt
11.59
+10436%

Ryzen 5 7535HS outperforms VIA Nano U2250 by a whopping 10436% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing VIA Nano U2250 and Ryzen 5 7535HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3354668
Place by popularitynot in top-10024
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesVIA Nanono data
Power efficiency1.0431.34
Architecture codenameIsaiah (2009)Rembrandt-R (2023)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

VIA Nano U2250 and Ryzen 5 7535HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads112
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz4.55 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data208 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on VIA Nano U2250 and Ryzen 5 7535HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketNanoBGA2FP7
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by VIA Nano U2250 and Ryzen 5 7535HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by VIA Nano U2250 and Ryzen 5 7535HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA Nano U2250 and Ryzen 5 7535HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 660M ( - 1900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by VIA Nano U2250 and Ryzen 5 7535HS.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

VIA Nano U2250 0.11
Ryzen 5 7535HS 11.59
+10436%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

VIA Nano U2250 179
Ryzen 5 7535HS 18408
+10184%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

VIA Nano U2250 888
Ryzen 5 7535HS 6257
+605%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

VIA Nano U2250 174
Ryzen 5 7535HS 8.4
+1971%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.11 11.59
Recency 1 January 2009 4 January 2023
Physical cores 1 6
Threads 1 12
Chip lithography 65 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

VIA Nano U2250 has 250% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 7535HS, on the other hand, has a 10436.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 7535HS is our recommended choice as it beats the VIA Nano U2250 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano U2250 and Ryzen 5 7535HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


VIA Nano U2250
Nano U2250
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS
Ryzen 5 7535HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 22 votes

Rate VIA Nano U2250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1419 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7535HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about VIA Nano U2250 or Ryzen 5 7535HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.