VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 vs VIA Nano U2250

Primary details

Comparing VIA Nano U2250 and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	3370	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	VIA Nano	C7-M
Power efficiency	1.04	no data
Architecture codename	Isaiah (2009)	Esther
Release date	1 January 2009 (15 years ago)	no data

Detailed specifications

VIA Nano U2250 and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	1	1
Boost clock speed	1.5 GHz	2 GHz
Bus rate	800 MHz	533 MHz
L2 cache	1 MB	no data
Chip lithography	65 nm	90 nm
64 bit support	+	-
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on VIA Nano U2250 and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	NanoBGA2	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	20 Watt

Pros & cons summary

---

Chip lithography	65 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	20 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano U2250 and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---