VIA Nano U2250 vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Primary details
Comparing VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and VIA Nano U2250 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | VIA | VIA Nano |
| Architecture codename | CNQ (2011) | Isaiah (2009) |
| Release date | 17 May 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 January 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and VIA Nano U2250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.46 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 132 mm2 | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and VIA Nano U2250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA | NanoBGA2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27.5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 May 2011 | 1 January 2009 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 10 Watt |
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 has an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.
VIA Nano U2250, on the other hand, has 170% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and VIA Nano U2250. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and VIA Nano U2250, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
